Two Weeks in Another Town


poster202_zpseeehnr2s

Introspection can be both self-indulgent and revealing, turning the gaze inward in search of some truth that seems elusive in the outside world can bring rewards, perhaps most notably for those whose business it is to present a facade for public consumption. It shouldn’t be all that surprising then that Hollywood, where dreams and illusion are daily spun from the dancing lights of the projector, periodically turns the cameras around to focus on itself. There’s something almost perverse about the industry’s need to pick away at its own glamorous veneer, as though it were prodding us in the ribs and daring us to confront the artifice at its heart. Two Weeks in Another Town (1962) was Vincente Minnelli’s second bite at the hand which fed him, following the previous decade’s The Bad and the Beautiful.

Jack Andrus (Kirk Douglas) is a movie star, one of that glittering breed idolized and worshiped by so many. Although it’s perhaps more accurate to say the Jack Andrus we see at the beginning was a movie star, a subdued figure strolling ineffectually round the grounds of the psychiatric clinic where he’s staying. The scar on his face, a memento of the events that led him to his current abode, has healed. However, it’s as nothing compared to the raw wounds he still carries around inside. His doctor says he feels Andrus is fit to leave, not necessarily cured but able to leave all the same. And there’s a hint of hope for the future too, a cable from his old director asking him to fly out to Rome for a small part in his latest production. But we’re talking about the movies here, where nothing and nobody can be taken at face value, and the truth is that Andrus is essentially washed up. The director, Maurice Kruger (Edward G Robinson), doesn’t really have any intention of using him on screen. Basically, it’s a ploy, partly as a kind of sop for Kruger’s guilt over his involvement in Andrus’ breakdown. If our star has hit bottom, then the once great director is headed in the same direction, although his decline is slightly more graceful and a little less dramatic. The picture represents something of a last bid for glory for Kruger, and it’s in danger of being derailed by the ruthlessness of his hard-headed Cinecittà producer. Standing between him and the prospect of failure and humiliation is Andrus, the man he first built up and then destroyed. So what does he do? He tosses this one-time star a few crumbs from his table, hoping that the hunger of a starving man will prove his salvation. To Andrus, the vital but seemingly demeaning task of supervising the post-production dubbing is like a slap in the face initially. Still, the lure of the movie business, and maybe more importantly, the chance to prove himself capable of doing anything of worth again is strong. And then there’s the figure of Carlotta (Cyd Charisse), the woman he tried to love and lost his mind over. She flits in and out of proceedings, simultaneously taunting Andrus with reminders of what he’s lost and holding out the promise of new adventures ahead. What it all boils down to is a two-week sojourn in a town where he may either drown in the heady atmosphere or, if he can see through the showbiz smokescreen, have the chance to regain the mastery of his soul once again.

£6

While I still think Two Weeks in Another Town is a very good film, it could potentially have been a great one. Charles Schnee wrote the script from a novel by Irwin Shaw, and the score was provided by the great David Raksin. With Milton Krasner shooting Minnelli’s beautiful nighttime setups just about all the ingredients were in place for a stone cold classic. But then, and ironically mirrored by the plot itself, came the interference from the studio. In his autobiography (The Ragman’s Son, Pan Books 1989,  pp 342-344), Douglas claims the movie was recut and edited when Joseph Vogel became the new head of MGM, stripping out some of the racier and more dramatically satisfying elements. I think that much can be seen in the somewhat sketchy development of a few of the characters. What we’re left with is the core of the story, of a man desperately seeking personal and spiritual redemption and the peace that comes with it. In addition, there’s the unmistakable stamp of Minnelli, the careful framing of whose shots create the kind of tableaux that approach visual poetry on occasion. It would be remiss of me not to mention his masterful use of color – the whole film is drenched in the deep, saturated hues which often characterize his work. Perhaps he falls short of achieving the dramatic and visual intensity of his sublime Some Came Running, but there are moments when he gets within striking distance at least.

Kirk Douglas was making his third appearance in a Minnelli production and he’s well cast in a role that calls for the type of mood swings which range from ebullience through manic intensity by way of brooding melancholy.  While the focal point of the story is on Andrus’ journey of self rediscovery, and the necessary laying to rest of old phantoms along the way, there’s room too for some interesting observations and musings on the nature of the actor, that wearer of masks. A wistful, early morning conversation with a besotted Daliah Lavi sees Douglas reflecting on the contradictory nature of the actor, the retreat from reality and submergence of the self in the character of others which actually runs counter to the overwhelming desire to better understand one’s own sense of being. Ultimately, it’s the reconciliation of these seemingly incompatible urges which lies at the heart of his character’s motivation.

£7

Robinson’s aging director is also notable, both in itself and as a commentary on the corrosiveness of the movie-making business. The essential insecurity of the man is demonstrated though the need to reaffirm himself through his notorious affairs with leading ladies  – which has had such an adverse effect on his relationship with his wife, an exceptionally acidic Claire Trevor – and also his desperation to prove once again his worth as an artist. It’s his fear of losing control, both personally and creatively, which drives him and finally twists his soul towards bitterness and distrust. The person who links (and divides) Douglas and Robinson is Carlotta as played by Cyd Charisse. Apparently a good deal of her part ended up on the cutting room floor, which is a shame as she is very good based on what we do see of her. Whether it was intentional or not from the outset, she comes across as a blend of the enigmatic and the alluring, leaving a trail of emotional devastation in her wake while attempting to seduce her former lover back onto the same self-destructive path. The contrast comes in the form of Daliah Lavi’s Roman ingenue (demurely clad in simple and pure white throughout as opposed to the arch and lurid costumes of Charisse) whose understated charm and innocence helps restore Andrus’ perspective. I was less impressed by George Hamilton’s troubled young star, never feeling all that convinced by the struggle he’s supposed to be waging against his personal demons. In support, there are small parts (virtual cameos in truth) for George Macready and James Gregory.

Two Weeks in Another Town is available on DVD as part of the Warner Archive in the US and there’s also an Italian release available. I have that Italian disc and it presents the film in the correct anamorphic scope ratio. The transfer is good, clean one with no notable instances of damage. Colors are generally well reproduced, something very important in a film such as this, and the image is pleasing overall. The disc offers the original English soundtrack and an Italian dub, and there are no subtitle options of any kind. As for extras, there’s the theatrical trailer and some galleries. Frankly, I like this movie, but films about films always interest me anyway, and I feel it’s a great pity that parts of it were excised at the behest of the studio boss at the time. Nevertheless, the movie that we have available to view, in spite of its imperfections, is never less than fascinating for the peek behind the facade of filmmaking it affords us and also the central story of a man battling to come to terms with himself and the choices he’s made in life. I recommend it.

Kirk Douglas reaches the grand age of 99 today and I thought I’d take the opportunity to post this piece on that occasion to draw attention not only to this great actor’s birthday but also to just one of the countless strong performances he’s delivered over a long career.

28 thoughts on “Two Weeks in Another Town

    • Cheers, Eric.
      It’s been ages since I last watched The Bad and the Beautiful and have forgotten a lot of the details but I agree it is a terrific film and I remember how impressed I was when I saw it. This one isn’t as good but, as you say, that’s a high standard anyway. I do think the cutting and editing it underwent after shooting had been completed is part of the reason.

      Liked by 1 person

  1. Great to post this on his birthday – well done sir! I saw this before BAD AND THE BEAUTIFUL but the earlier film, while lacking the color and sheer delirium, is probably more satisfying. I remember thinking it was a bit turgid but actually it has been decades since I saw this – must get that Italian DVD. This was made at about the time my Ma arrived in Rome and met my Da …

    Like

    • Until recently, I’d only seen bits and pieces of this movie but I liked the look of what I did see. As I said above, The Bad and the Beautiful is a better piece of work overall but the scope framing, that intense atmosphere, and the marvelous use of color, not to mention some fine performances make this one more than worthwhile too in my opinion.
      Your folks might get a kick out of it too under the circumstances.

      Like

  2. I picked the Warner Archive release up in a sale a while ago but I still haven’t watched it. There’s nothing I enjoy better than scope films of this vintage and, with this cast, it’s got class written all over it. So, I will be delaying no longer and will watch this during the next few days. Many thanks for the review Colin.
    (By the way, I’m not sure about this seasonal snowfall on the website. In my view Cyd looks better without snow falling all over her! 🙂 🙂 )

    Like

    • Get to it, Dafydd! I hope you like it when you watch it and I’d enjoy hearing your thoughts afterwards.
      The snowfall is one of those WordPress features that runs through the Christmas season. Generally, I like it and don’t disable it, but I suppose it might look a little out of place in this context.

      Like

  3. Great review Colin, and a nice way to celebrate Kirk’s 99th. I had him pegged largely as a genre star but certain films have made me look at him differently – STRANGERS WHEN WE MEET could have been overtly melodramatic but for Kirk’s fine, soul searching turn. I’ll have to pick this up from Amazon Italy.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks for that, Mike. I think he was very much a genre star in the sense he worked in just about every genre imaginable, although it’s worth noting that he’s never become identified with any particular one.

      Like

  4. Pingback: The Bad and the Beautiful | Riding the High Country

    • Well, I’m a huge fan of Minnelli’s work so I’m happy to enthuse about this movie – the cast, locations, use of color, and so on. Having said that, I readily acknowledge it won’t be to everybody’s taste. If you’ve seen and like, for example, The Bad and the Beautiful, Home from the Hill or the superlative Some Came Running, then you would like it.

      Like

  5. Pingback: Scene of the Crime | Riding the High Country

  6. It’s depressing that in 1962 studio execs were still busily engaged in their favourite pastime – ruining other people’s movies.

    I liked Two Weeks in Another Town but it is a bit disjointed. Now I know why.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.