No, I haven’t decided to transform this place into a restaurant review site. The “house” I’m referring to here is the Hollywood studio, and the question is which one, or ones, we are most partial to.
While all of the major studios, and most of the minor ones too, made movies in every conceivable genre in their heyday, they tended to have their own characteristic or in-house style, not to mention the films they either specialized in or seemed to do more successfully. Warner Brothers gave us the better gangster films of the 30s and retained that grit and social awareness even as time moved on and the range of output expanded. MGM was gloss, glitz and musical spectaculars. And although RKO had Astaire & Rogers, it also turned out some of the most memorable films noir. Of course different decades brought different directions and developments, and 20th Century Fox with its pioneering of the Scope format, took the production of the epic to a whole new level in the 50s.
For me though, my favorite of the classic era studios is possibly Universal; this is something I’ve lately settled on though, and I’m well aware that my preferences may shift again in the future. Anyway, for now at least, Universal is the one. Why? Well, there is the wonderful horror cycle running from the 30s through to the mid-40s, and then the Rathbone/Bruce Sherlock Holmes movies that borrowed those old sets and a touch of the macabre sensibility too. Then there were the budget-conscious noir and crime movies that were so common in the 40s and 50s, so many of which are now neglected and half-forgotten. And let’s not forget the Universal-International period, those marvelous years when some of the most visually attractive and thematically rich westerns seemed to be constantly on tap.
So there it is. Do you have a studio you’re happiest visiting? Is there one whose output appeals more, or does it vary from decade to decade?
Warners for me, partly for sentimental reasons I admit as THE WARNER BROS. STORY by Clive Hirschhorn was my firat ever film book at age 11. Plus Curtiz remains my favourite studio era director (just finished Alan K Rode’s mammoth new biography of him).
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have that Hirschhorn book too. In fact I have similar format histories for most of the major studios (not all by the same author though) although I don’t think I ever had one for Fox. I remember spending many happy, and envious, hours poring over the stills and synopses of all those movies back in that pre-Internet age.
LikeLike
The Fox one is OK but not part of the series (I have them all 😀). The RKO and MGM entrues are my next favourites
LikeLike
Back in the day, much of the attraction of these kinds of books was the fact they highlighted so many films that I’d never seen – or even heard of – and sometimes just a still was enough to capture my imagination and ensure that I looked out for certain elusive titles and scoured the TV listings for any rare screenings – all told, an oddly reassuring feeling of both nostalgia, optimism and frustration now.
LikeLike
Too true chum – real treasure troves. Now everything is seemingly available but almost always denuded of proper context. Most unsatisfactory way backwards!
LikeLike
Now we can check oceans of basic facts in seconds, but it is a colder process, and you’re right about the contextual element being largely absent, We’ve lost a wee bit of the magic and wonder of it all too, I feel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess for me it’s RKO, simply because they made so many of my favourite thrillers, and Astaire/Rogers. Best RKO decade for me would be the 40s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good choice and very valid reasons too – that studio was very strong in the 40s.
LikeLike
I love RKO and Universal. I think some of the best and most imaginative classic films came out of those two over the years.
I also consider the logos for both of these studios to be great favourites. My favourite Universal logo is the one with plane flying around the Earth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, those logos/idents were indeed memorable.
LikeLike
Hi Colin, enjoyed your post. I’d have to say my favorite would be Warner Brothers. You could count on them for fast-moving, hard-hitting gritty dramas that not only kept your interest but left you thoroughly entertained. I would say, arguably of course, that Warner’s output during the Golden Era of Hollywood would still hold up today even for the moviegoer who prefers the current slate of movies made over the classic period. They were tightly constructed plots with great writing, great directing, and wonderful characters all in the Warner way. My second favorite would be Universal in the 50’s due to, not just the wonderful Westerns of that period produced by them which were second to none, but also the lush, beautiful melodramas in eye-popping Technicolor, with the outstanding work of Douglas Sirk being the prime example. In my opinion, two great examples of studios that allowed those within to hone their craft and turn out work that helped define the period to this day.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. Yes, WB movies have, for the most part, weathered very well and that trademark grit, regardless of genre, retains a lot of its power.
I’m glad you mentioned those Sirk films, important and beautifully shot works that indeed represent some of the very best the era had to offer.
LikeLike
Warner Brothers of the 30’s and 40’s. What put them over the top for me was the musical scores of Max Steiner, Franz Waxman and Erich Wolfgang Korngold.
LikeLike
Yes indeed, Scott. The work of those composers was considerable. I can never think of Errol Flynn’s fine early films without also thinking of the music of Korngold.
LikeLike
Korngold could make excellent films great. Case in point…….1942 Kings Row.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quite. Actually, I’m pleased you brought up these names as I think it’s easy to focus mainly on the actors, directors and writers – and perhaps the cinematographers too as filmmaking is such a visual medium – and unintentionally neglect others such as the composers. The collective or collaborative nature of the process of making movies is one the art form’s great strengths and it’s good to be reminded of this.
LikeLike
Setting the stage for what’s about to come. My favorite four……..Gone With the Wind, The High and the Mighty, Kings Row and my favorite sleeper…Victory at Sea.
LikeLike
Hmm, not that familiar with the latter – will have to do a bit of checking around…
LikeLike
Here you go Colin…………..
Victory At Sea Theme Song – YouTube
LikeLike
Later adapted by its composer Richard Rodgers and Oscar Hammerstein into the very beautiful song “No Other Love” for Rodgers-Hammerstein musical ME AND JULIET (1953, as underrated as some of those “non-major” studios). Interesting for a melody for a war documentary to be turned into a love song as this was.
LikeLike
The studio sorting hat puts me at 20th Century Fox. Ford flicks. Literary adaptations. Films noir. Technicolor musicals. And a B unit that is tops – Charlie Chan, Mike Shayne, Mr. Moto … the stuff that kept me up late on school nights, and is a comfort when I’m late because I’m not a kid anymore.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good points. I tend to think of Fox mainly in terms of its 50s output – those Scope productions are frequently breathtaking. But you’re quite right about the “B” unit and those superb second features and series.
LikeLike
Nice subject. Very interesting to me and I think most who love classical cinema have thought a lot about it.
I mostly like all the studios, but different ones more at different times. It’s hard seeing RKO kind of run into the ground in the 50s after its great 30s and 40s, Howard Hughes pretty much responsible for this even if he was supportive of one great director in Nicholas Ray. Fox did have John Ford for a long time under non-exclusive contract and made many great films there–and had Henry King most of his career (most underrated of the great directors for me).
I also would say Fox had the best Technicolor in the 40s (black and white was pervasively good at all the studios until it was finally displaced for good). Warner Bros. jumps out a lot in the way you say for the character of its films but more so earlier than later–but always a lot of great films from them.
Republic was most underrated (nice they are getting the attention now). There really is a kind of “Republic poetry” born of prose and it’s very appealing in all kinds of movies. Most overrated was pre-war MGM–very little that is great there and I really dislike that over lit, airless feeling and something of an aura of pretension that can go along with it. But it got much better when Vincente Minnelli came in the 40s (meaning the art department improved with his influence) and then when Schary came in and Mayer left, there is a deeper range of films and it gets on par with the others.
Colin, in the end I am with you on Universal but not for all periods. Their silent years and 30s and 40s are a rich history–and mostly non-prestigious films but with a lot of artistry–but it’s for the Universal-International period (1947-1963) that I really prize and cherish them. There is a rich studio style though those years to which everyone contributes–and not only are there so many great Westerns, and melodramas (not only of Sirk, but he took the studio to its peak for me), but other wonderful films, like the science-fiction cycle in the 50s (I wrote a long piece about this in THE SCIENCE-FICTION FILM READER that gave me a chance to share some of my love and appreciation of the studio). I grew up watching U-I double bills, that I still enjoy and I still love so many of those movies. I even liked the logo then (Universal changed logos many times–the U-I one had no set musical theme–or even set color when it was in color–and so the mood of the specific movie was carried by the music in the first few seconds–TOUCH OF EVIL is a great example of that). I just got back to what I have to say is my favorite 50s U-I movie THE TARNISHED ANGELS (Sirk) after Dorothy Malone’s death (she is just superb in it, as are the other leads) and was as as sublime as ever–this is black and white ‘Scope, which they made the most of for several years late 50s. Jack Arnold, one of their core directors said that “MGM was the Tiffany, we were the May Company.” I loved that and quoted it in my piece.
I hasten to add that once MCA/Wasserman took over and it went back to “Universal” (logo changed late in 1963), the studio rapidly took a dive, put up that theme park, pretty much packed in its artfulness on most films for the remainder of the 60s and I don’t feel the same way about it from that point on. Of course, they’ve had good movies along the way since then but it’s not the same–it’s been a hard fall and that’s why I could never name it as my favorite studio overall. With the current logo and awful music (is it John Williams?), I tune out the music and just wait for it to pass and hate it that they attach it before the original U-I logo on DVD but just have to live with that.
Anyway, I assume you were talking about classic studio years when the studios all had a style, so I guess I addressed this that way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Blake, it’s always a delight to hear from you, and your contributions invariably add more food for thought.
Firstly, can I just say that yes, I was writing here with the classic era of the Hollywood studios specifically in mind. As such I fully agree on the sudden and unfortunate decline of Universal in the 60s and was thinking primarily of its golden years when I expressed my preference. I could and should have mentioned the Sci-Fi films produced at the studio when I was speaking of my fondness for it, but you’ve set that right here and thanks for doing so, and of course for bringing up the marvelous The Tarnished Angels and the recently deceased Dorothy Malone.
I also agree with you on MGM and the way it grew much more interesting visually and richer on every artistic level as time went on, and particularly after Dore Schary took charge. I seem to remember someone arguing here that this was the beginning of that studio’s decline financially, but I don’t care much about that – the films of that era speak for themselves in terms of quality.
LikeLike
By the way, not to hit too much of a down note but Hirschhorn’s book on Universal is pretty relentlessly negative on the U-I period and dismissive of the movies so many of us love, with little affinity for melodrama or most Westerns. Since it has been the only overview for a long time, I believe that book has caused the studio to undervalue their library and put it all out more slowly, at least stateside.
Really, I don’t know why he wrote the Universal book (except for money). He seemed to have some real affection for some of the other studios but to hold himself superior to this one. I believe people should write books on subjects they love. This will be done justice one day.
LikeLike
You know, it’s been so long now since I looked through that book that I have no memory of how he reacted to the films critically. I do think that Universal, and particularly the U-I years, were generally undervalued for a long time by a number of commentators. I’d like to think that attitudes have shifted though and that there is a greater appreciation of its output now.
LikeLike
This is a great idea for a piece, Colin, and the resultant comments are really interesting.
Warners had great style and panache and nobody did gangster films quite like them. But I am also very much in the Universal-International camp and echo many thoughts expressed above. Some great little ‘noirs’ and then throughout the 50s that wonderful body of work in the western genre.
I would also though champion RKO in the 40s. Their ‘noirs’ were tops and their post-WW2 westerns with Tim Holt are special favourites of mine.
As a fan of ‘the mighty Bs’, I have to also mention my huge fondness for Allied Artists and, especially, Republic Studios.
By the way, Columbia is also a standout studio for me, going way back to their superior B westerns with Buck Jones and Tim McCoy right through the 40s and 50s with some fine underrated films.
LikeLike
Jerry, I was wondering if anyone would champion Columbia. It often feels like one of those maligned studios and I’ll admit it’s harder to get a sense of individual identity for it, at least compared to some others. However, it gave us some fine Frank Capra films, a few really good and still somewhat elusive “B” mystery series (Crime Doctor, Boston Blackie, Lone Wolf), and plenty of Randolph Scott westerns including the Ranowns.
LikeLike
……….and who could ever forget Capra’s LOST HORIZON (1937). For me, the most surrealistic and atmospheric film ever made for the screen. In retrospect, a great motion picture achievement for it’s time. One of my top ten favorites.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Scott, I very much like Lost Horizon too. I first saw it when it was screened on UK TV late night sometime in the mid-80s, I think scheduled and championed by the late Leslie Halliwell. I’d not seen the movie before that, and I’m not even sure I’d heard of it. Right from the beginning I was drawn in and as soon as everybody boarded the plane and it was hi-jacked I was hooked. As it played it I can only say I was entranced, both by the visuals and the humanism of the whole thing. I’ve never tired of the film and bought it again on Blu-ray a few months ago.
LikeLike
Got to say this……..if anyone was born to be an actor it was Ronald Colman. He was class personified in every distinguishing way at the utmost level. We were lucky to have him and be witness to his great talent. He just made you feel good about things.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes indeed, I don’t believe I’ve seen him give a bad performance in anything – he was wholly credible on the screen and his work always came across as honest.
LikeLike
Colin, I know I am off subject a little. But for me it will always be Republic because of my all-time favorite…Wild Bill Elliott ( the peaceable man ). The Red Ryder’s and pairing with Tex Ritter also great. Big Randolph Scott fan also. Love your site and I am new member!
LikeLike
Hello, Cliff, and welcome! You’re not the least bot off subject – I’m not sure that’s really possible in this place anyway – and there are plenty of other fans both of Republic studios and Wild Bill Elliott to be found popping in and out and contributing here.
LikeLike
I guess I’d circle over to the home of the monsters if pressed. On that note I’d also point out that I was very conscious of Hammer Studios as well growing up and to this day love their monster cycle as well as most of their films in general.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me too, Mike. If I weren’t deliberately limiting myself to classic era Hollywood studios, then I’d have to put Hammer up there too, and of course Ealing would be another strong UK contender.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Feeling rather Masochistic last night I decided to watch
the Baftas,something I have not done for many a moon.
I noted that when mentioning all those who passed away recently
they failed to mention Dorothy Malone,quiet an oversight,I thought.
Watching the whole thing it reminded me why i much prefer
“The Golden Age” to what’s on offer today.
To be fair Ms Lumley was an improvement over Stephen Fry
but that’s the only positive I can add.
As much as I love those classic Universal horrors like Blake
I am a great admirer of Universal International in the fifties.
I loved their roster of Western stars-Joel McCrea,Audie Murphy,
Rory Calhoun,Jock Mahoney and Jeff Chandler.
The excellent McCrea and Murphy Westerns normally clocked in
at $750,000 so they were hardly B movies…programmers if you will.
They normally ran about 80 minutes which made them ideal to
program with similar fare. An example BLACK HORSE CANYON
top billed over NAKED ALIBI again clocking in around 80 minutes
a nicely contrasting program,I might add,.
Similar 80 minute fare were the Budd Boetticher films,mostly
Westerns but with a few diversions CITY UNDER THE SEA and
RED BALL EXPRESS for example.
Then there was Universal’s bigger budget films-the aforementioned
Douglas Sirk pictures and those wonderful Anthony Mann Westerns.
Universal had a fine roster of “house” directors..to name a few
Joseph Pevney,Jesse Hibbs,Jack Arnold,Nathan Juran among others.
Like Blake I also love the Universal Sci Fi Fifties films-the outstanding
Jack Arnold contributions and key movies from people like Joseph Newman,
John Sherwood and Virgil Vogel.
Unlike programmer Westerns from say Allied Artists the Universal
ones always played the major circuits-mainly because of Universal’s
tie in with the Rank distribution network.
Some examples…..WALK THE PROUD LAND supported
THE UNGUARDED MOMENT…A DAY OF FURY supported
WHO DONE IT? (Benny Hill big screen effort)
RED SUNDOWN supported ALL FOR MARY
and much later SHOWDOWN (Audie Murphy) supported
THE LIST OF ADRIAN MESSENGER.
Interestingly SHOWDOWN has just been given a stellar transfer
from Koch Germany on Blu Ray and Adrian Messenger has just
been announced on Blu Ray from Universal USA in what looks like a
new line of classic titles in high-def.
Like Jerry I have a fondness for the Allied Artists films of the Fifties
lots of Westerns many in color & CinemaScope-WICHITA,THE FIRST
TEXAN,CANYON RIVER,DRAGOON WELLS MASSACRE,AT GUNPOINT
LAST OF THE BADMEN among others.
Most of these played the major circuits while others like CANYON RIVER
were thrown away to the independents-fare like this provided smaller cinemas
a life line,for a while at least.
Unbelievably the classic INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS was turned
down by the majors.
Jerry also mentioned Columbia…how could I resist all those beloved
Sam Katzman films.
LikeLike
John, those double bills you mention sound fantastic and feature an extremely eclectic mash up of genres.
LikeLike
Just a little more on U-I double features that I so enjoyed in those years and that John Knight talks about.
They were not the same everywhere. The one he and I have in common was THE LIST OF ADRIAN MESSENGER and SHOWDOWN–which I saw while in school in San Francisco (and of course I liked the punchy SHOWDOWN, paired as the unheralded co-feature, better than the top-billed gimmicky mystery). But later back in Los Angeles in summer, SHOWDOWN opened as second feature to A GATHERING OF EAGLES (this would have been the last U-I double bill of films with that logo there) and I didn’t go but feel that I would have enjoyed that more, having seen GATHERING years later (though still would like the Audie Murphy Western more).
In the 50s, often the movies were more or less paired as equal–a great example was NAKED ALIBI and FOUR GUNS TO THE BORDER; of course it’s well-known here that the second movie means a lot to me so this was a day of being really entranced, given that the noirish NAKED ALIBI was very absorbing too (and both shot by Russell Metty no less!). Maybe that’s when I began to really favor the studio (late 1954) and more and more tried to make a point to get to these double bills.
Even if the second feature was treated that way–and the other as the main attraction–it could often be better (THE LAST OF THE FAST GUNS, though the comedy THE PERFECT FURLOUGH, directed by Blake Edwards, was enjoyable too and they contrasted well), or at least generally a worthy and effectively contrasting companion, as SHOWDOWN AT ABILENE was playing second billed to THE UNGUARDED MOMENT.
Of course, here too we had the Rank main features (or more often the second features as TURN THE KEY SOFTLY with SASKATCHEWAN) but the pairing of the home-made Universal ones tended more to be the magical ones for me.
So, for example, when ALL THAT HEAVEN ALLOWS went wide after a brief exclusive as a single feature, they opened RED SUNDOWN as the co-feature. Anyone here who knows that exquisite Sirk melodrama and wonderful Arnold Western will know that to see this (early 1956) as I did was to be in a kind of cinematic Heaven.
Meanwhile, yes, there are core directors (as well as producers), actors, cinematographers, art directors, costume designers, sound and music people and (to an extent) writers who thread through the decade and my response is generally positive to all those people and their contributions, even though some are special favorites and some of the directors (Sirk, Mann, Arnold, Sherman–just to start–especially brilliant in their movies while under U-I contract). It’s true of all the studios of course but I especially liked this group and what they created, more resourcefully from an economic perspective but it was all there on the screen in the artistry and lacked for nothing.
Joseph Pevney directed the most 50s U-I (25 movies)–loaned out once for Martin and Lewis THREE RING CIRCUS at Paramount. I like Pevney over a range of films–THE MIDNIGHT STORY especially is a real beauty and still underrated–though somewhat less on fantasy subjects where someone like Rudolph Mate might thrive. Sirk is a close second with 21 movies–he was never loaned out–plainly they quickly came to appreciate what they had in him. All of Anthony Mann’s five movies were produced by Aaron Rosenberg who I’d name as the studio’s best producer until he left near the end of the decade (not only did Mann prize him but Budd Boetticher, who responded negatively to his other producers there, really liked Rosenberg and made a point of saying so). Ross Hunter of course made a strong career there too–though for me, it’s better overall before Sirk’s 1959 departure from the studio). Naturally, I’m mindful of Albert Zugsmith’s superb contribution as producer of some venturesome projects, a number of them favorites of mine.
Well, I could go on and on but I guess a lot of us could. It still has a glow for me to think about all this now.
LikeLike
It definitely creates a glow for me just reading about this stuff, possibly due to my not having experienced this – there is something rather wondrous about hearing how these pairings were seen, and thinking of all the talents involved. One great thing about discussing this nowadays is the ease with which a lot of the double bills can be replicated – it’s not the same thing of course but a touch of that original magic can still be felt nonetheless.
LikeLike
Of course, mostly it was all just taken for granted then, one more movie or one more double bill, especially with so many movies relatively undervalued in relation to the way we think of them now. There was no prestige around so many of the movies we love (regardless of the studio, though U-I is certainly one of the ones that jumps out in that regard). But it does seem like, for so many of us, this was a truly special part of our whole experience. For me, it’s nice to know that is shared by others more than I ever knew at the time.
LikeLike
Quite. I get a lot of pleasure myself from the fact we’re all able to share our appreciation and enjoyment of this material, bringing together all our varied and various perspectives that range from those who saw first-run theatrical screenings to others who caught later TV reruns and now more recent home video releases. The linking thread which runs through all of this is our collective enthusiasm.
LikeLike
Ha! Colin….
I feel you have really started something here…
While on the subject of Columbia I had to mention
Warwick Films a great British brand distributed by Columbia.
While the Carry On’s and Hammer have been more than catered
for regarding releases lots of key Warwick’s remain on the missing list
and that’s a shame.
For what it’s worth (again) here are my “most wanted” Warwicks
none of these thus far has even had a DVD release.
A PRIZE OF GOLD………………………………..Richard Widmark
THE MAN INSIDE…………………………………..Jack Palance
HIGH FLIGHT………………………………………..Ray Milland
KILLERS OF KILIMANJARO…………………….Robert Taylor
NO TIME TO DIE……………………………………Victor Mature
THE BANDIT OF ZHOBE…………………………Victor Mature.
These titles on a Powerhouse/Indicator collection would indeed be
wonderful.
No B Movie nut can ignore Columbia who like Republic were still
making serials way into the 1950’s
As has been mentioned before there are, of course, all those 50’s
Randolph Scott Westerns including the Ranowns.
LikeLike
I don’t believe I’ve ever seen any of those Warwick productions you listed there, John. I’m guessing the films haven’t been shown much on TV either as I don’t think I’ve even heard of them before now – this kind of info is always very welcome and extremely interesting.
LikeLike
I lack sufficient insight into the different studios to really contribute — it never occured to me to notice than an RKO picture was any different in scope or tone to a Warner one — and so I’ve learned a huge amount from these comments. However, I would just like to add that I’ve always beena fan of the paranoid, Communist-threat allegory science fiction movies of the 1950s (The Thing from Another World, Body Snatchers, Teenagers from Outer Space, etc). These hold a particular fascination for me, though were doubtless put out by a range of studios…
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s one of those things that kind of jumps out at you once you start noticing it, JJ.
On the Red Scare inspired Sci-Fi movies, they were indeed produced by a range of studios but, once again, Universal released some very high quality material in the genre – arguably leading the field in this respect.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think most of those Warwick movies appeared on UK TV many years ago (I’m talking decades probably). I would dearly like to see “PRIZE OF GOLD”.
Really nice to welcome Cliff to our enthusiasts club. Nice to have a fellow Wild Bill Elliott devotee on board.
This has turned into an exceptionally interesting and insightful thread, Colin. As ever, so much to learn along the way…….
LikeLike
If those films were on UK TV, then it must have been an awful long time ago – maybe the 70s?
I quite agree, Jerry, that there’s been a lot of new information to absorb, and it’s nice when an entry here sparks that kind of thing.
LikeLike
Firstly,let me say that my comments yesterday were put together
in a hurry and I made a serious omission by not mentioning
George Sherman among my list of Universal “house” directors.
As my previous comments on double bills have generated some
positive feedback,from Blake especially, I thought I would expand
further having done some research-the others came literally
off the top of my head.
Usually,in the UK the Universal films were paired together,
as mentioned before they all gained major circuit releases
and sometimes they were paired with films from different studios
as the following list will indicate.
These are how the films appeared in the UK and as Blake
mentions in America the releases differed.
CATTLE DRIVE/UP FRONT
THE WORLD IN HIS ARMS/MA & PA KETTLE AT THE FAIR
BECAUSE OF YOU/HORIZONS WEST
THE DARK MAN/KANSAS RAIDERS
A & C MEET THE INVISIBLE MAN/HOLLYWOOD STORY
LOST/STAR IN THE DUST
DAWN AT SOCORRO/FRANCIS IN THE WACS
BORDER RIVER/THE RUNAWAY BUS
THE BIGAMIST/TUMBLEWEED
A & C MEET THE KEYSTONE COPS/FOUR GUNS TO THE BORDER
CONGO CROSSING/RAW EDGE
ISTANBUL/FRANCIS IN THE HAUNTED HOUSE
SMOKE SIGNAL/THE LOOTERS
BENGAL RIFLES/DRUMS ACROSS THE RIVER
BACKLASH/THE GELIGNITE GANG
VALLEY OF FURY/LADY GODIVA
THE RAWHIDE YEARS/TIMESLIP
THE SPOILERS/THE KETTLES IN THE OZARKS
ONE DESIRE/KISS OF FIRE
FEMALE ON THE BEACH/THIS ISLAND EARTH
NEVER STEAL ANYTHING SMALL/NO NAME ON THE BULLET
IMITATION OF LIFE/MONEY WOMEN AND GUNS
That is,of course only a small selection of Universal films released in the UK
during the fifties. I might add that VALLEY OF FURY was the UK title for
CHIEF CRAZY HORSE and BENGAL RIFLES the UK title for BENGAL BRIGADE.
LikeLike
Some of those double bills sound quite intriguing, and I’m especially taken with the US/UK mash-ups such as Backlash/The Gelignite Gang and The Rawhide Years/Timeslip.
LikeLike
That’s a fantastic list of great information John, and as I’ve said to you before, l really wish that l’d had the foresight to write a list of the hundreds of double bills l saw way back in the 1950s and onwards.
LikeLike
Regarding Allied Artists pictures they fared less well in
gaining major circuit bookings though many minor films
did appear as support features on the majors.
As mentioned previously quiet a few Allied Artists films were turned
down by the majors but these films provided a life-line for struggling
independent cinemas.
The following double bills appeared on the smaller circuits and
independent cinemas…often “flea pits”
ALADDIN AND HIS LAMP/FEUDIN’ FOOLS
SABU AND THE MAGIC RING/SNOWFIRE
NAKED IN THE SUN/SPOOK CHASERS
CANYON RIVER/HOLD THAT HYPNOTIST
INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS/THE INDESTRUCTIBLE MAN
The hugely popular Bowery Boys pictures played both at the majors
and were a huge boost to double bills that appeared at independent
cinemas.
I might add that NAKED IN THE SUN is not an early “nudie” picture
but an independently made Western shot in Florida.
The following are Allied Artists pictures that gained major
circuit bookings.
The following list is where Allied Artists pictures ran mainly as second features
MURDER INCORPORATED/CAVALRY SCOUT
I WAS MONTY’S DOUBLE/COLE YOUNGER GUNFIGHTER
NO TREES IN THE STREET/DEATH IN SMALL DOSES
THE MOONRAKER/OREGON PASSAGE
THE SEA CHASE/THE FORTY NINERS
GIRLS AT SEA/GUNSMOKE IN TUCSON
THE MAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN/TWO GUNS AND A BADGE
THE TALL STRANGER/THE GOLDEN DISC
The following are where both films are Allied Artists pictures
WICHITA/JAIL BUSTERS
AL CAPONE/WOLF LARSEN/
THE BIG CIRCUS/KING OF THE WILD STALLIONS
PAY OR DIE/THE PLUNDERERS
HELL TO ETERNITY/OPERATION EICHMANN
LikeLike
No one thus far I believe has mentioned Paramount and
as I’ve often knocked them for failing to release many
fine films from their library especially all the Republic titles
they now own (which include many Allied Artists and RegalScope
pictures)
However my attitude to them has warmed somewhat especially
as they are supplying 4K high def masters of many Republic titles
and even minor fare like Allied Artists HIGHWAY DRAGNET.
Whoever thought we would get films like HIGHWAY DRAGNET
on Blu Ray. Most of Paramount’s restorations will be released by
Kino Lorber although I’m sure other boutique imprints will pick
some of them up as well.
I might add that all of Paramount’s pre 1949 titles are now
owned by Universal.
Paramount were never considered a B Movie outfit,especiallty
in the Fifties but they did make some wonderful B crime thrillers in
the late 30’s early 40’s.
The Paramount Crime B’s are some of the best ever made and
most of them move like rockets.
Sadly all the films I am going to mention are unavailable on disc and
that’s a great shame.
Blake is a huge admirer of Henry King and I’m a huge admirer
of Henry’s lesser known brother Louis.
As wonderful as these Paramount B crime thrillers are there are
two that really stand out from the pack.
Louis King’s PERSONS IN HIDING pre dates and pre figures
both GUN CRAZY and BONNIE AND CLYDE.
Patricia Morison is magnetic in the lead.
PERSONS IN HIDING has been championed by our friend Laura
and deserves to be far more well known. B Crime thrillers
simply do not come any better.
Robert Florey’s PAROLE FIXER is also a total knockout.
There is a sensational scene where a woman in peril throws a
pot of scalding hot coffee over sadistic monster Anthony Quinn.
For the era this scene packs a real jolt.
It pre figures not only THE BIG HEAT but also Mann’s RAW DEAL
where Raymond Burr throws a bowl of flaming brandy over a woman
who has upset him at a party.
Mann shoots the scene from the point of view of the victim
so thankfully we don’t see the results…nasty as it is.
Florey’s KING OF ALCATRAZ is also excellent as are Louis King’s
other Paramount B’s TIP OFF GIRLS,PRISON FARM,HUNTED MEN,
UNDERCOVER DOCTOR,ILLEGAL TRAFFIC.
Another sublime entry is Florey’s WOMEN WITHOUT MEN….
these films really need to be released by Universal.
I have never seen any of the 1940’s Paramount Pine Thomas B pictures
normally starring the likes of Richard Alrlen and I’d really like to.
I have seen quiet a few of Pine Thomas Paramount A pictures of the Fifties
and it’s heartening that Kino Lorber plan to release several
of these films.
Paramount’s color always seemed to be ahead of the pack on their
Fifties films and looked even better when they adopted the high def VistaVision
process. I await with great anticipation the Pine Thomas films planned by Kino
they should look sensational.
LikeLike
Actually, I had Paramount in mind as I was putting this short post together – just in terms of a brief comment to make on the house style. And struggling to come up with something distinctive, I ended up skipping over the studio. Now you mention those often stunning VistaVision productions of the 50s, I think I may have been too hasty and also a little unfair.
LikeLike
Tremendous amount of (to some, like me) essential information from John. You really are a fount of knowledge, John! Now, I did know this, but perhaps not the extent.
I remember the double bill of “THE BIG CIRCUS” and “KING OF THE WILD STALLIONS” (my reason for going to the cinema that day). I also remember my Mum and Dad taking me to see “THE TALL STRANGER” (which I loved) but I don’t remember its pairing, “THE GOLDEN DISC”. Mind you, it WAS 60 years ago!!
Some real variety in those double bill pairings. Some fit together better than others. For instance, I don’t know what I would have made of going to see “FOUR GUNS TO THE BORDER” and then having to sit through the ‘A’ picture (Abbot & Costello) – well, I do know what I would have thought actually LOL.
LikeLike
Gee,thanks Jerry…look who’s talking!! 🙂
I have an obsession to find out what played with what
during the 1950’s certain issues of Picture House Magazine
have helped. The official journal of the Cinema Theatre Association.
In researching old newspaper archives I have been able to trace
back to what I saw at various “revival” cinemas,including possibly
my favourite the Essoldo Caledonian Road which sadly closed in 1964.
The Essoldo had a wonderful wide screen and showed some amazing
double bills.
In my continued efforts I am generally amazed to find that during the 1950’s
certain small East End cinemas often showed the Bomba films as the
MAIN feature often supported by a B Series. Western.
Even with adverts trailers (and sometimes serial episodes)
these sort of programmes clocked in at less than 3 hours which meant
they could cram in possibly at least three sessions per day.
As mentioned previously The Bowery Boys films were firm favourites
for these smaller cinemas,and like the BOMBA films normally clocked
in at just under 70 Minutes.
Jerry,did you know Wayne Morris appeared in the last of the Bomba’s
(LORD OF THE JUNGLE) he was really at a low point then and was soon
off to the UK to appear in fare like THE GELIGNITE GANG.
I think a drink problem was a cause of his career decline and in those
British B’s he seems to be virtually chain smoking.
No doubt a lot of this was due to his extensive combat role in WW2
and contributed to his early passing.
Though virtually forgotten Morris is fondly remembered by many fans
for his Monogram and Allied Artists Westerns which really were the
swan song for the B series Western.
I am sure Jerry will correct me if I’m wrong but Morris’
TWO GUNS AND A BADGE is often considered the last B Series
Western. I was also amazed that it was rescued from obscurity and
dusted down as the support feature to the rather later THE MAN WHO
UNDERSTOOD WOMEN which had a major circuit release.
So,in the UK at least the final B Series Western went out in a blaze
of glory in getting a major circuit release-not relegated to the “flea pits”
as was often the case for this type of fare.
Remember this was years before the multiplexes-I’d love to see what
TWO GUNS AND A BADGE would look like on a massive single screen.
As a correction to some of my previous posts the double bill of MURDER
INCORPORATED/CAVALRY SCOUT I would like to point out that the former
was the UK title for THE ENFORCER…what a contrasting program though
I’m sure Rod Cameron’s younger Western fans were dismayed by
THE ENFORCER’s “X” certificate…(over 16’s only)
It’s such fun recalling those great double bills and thanks to Colin
for indulging the “geek” in some of us at least.
I like Colin’s term “mash up” when one considers those odd UK/USA
pairings at UK cinemas in the 1950’s.
I remember my Father a DIY fanatic had sent myself and my Mother to
Camden Town to a leading hardware store there.
We decided to pay a visit to the Plaza cinema showing the double bill
THE ROAD TO DENVER with THEY CAN’T HANG ME.
I totally enjoyed both films which was not often the case with such double
bills….a.” mash up” to be sure but a perfectly contrasting one I might add.
LikeLike
Wayne Morris, now that’s a B-Westerner that l like a lot. I can’t ever remember seeing a Wayne Morris western in my younger years, l’m sure my first viewing was on NTSC tapes that l bought from America. Picture quality was not that good, but l did finally get to see Two Guns and a Badge, which was much better than l was led to believe from reading western film books. Thanks to Warner Archive, his films are now in top quality.
I think Monogram films were released by British Lion in UK.
LikeLike
Quick follow up, Monogram released by Associated British Pathe in UK.
I think British Lion released Republic, l await to be corrected.
LikeLike
Colin regarding our previous comments on VistaVision
I would like to add that only four of the Pine Thomas films
were made in VistaVision and it’s good to know that you
also are a fan of the process.
The 4 P.T films are as follows
THE FAR HORIZONS,LUCY GALLANT,HELL’S ISLAND
and RUN FOR COVER.
HELL’S ISLAND is one of my “most wanted” titles on Blu Ray;
Phil Karlson’s cult status seems to go up and down..I really
don’t know how he rates at the moment apart from folks like
Blake and Toby. He’s always rated very high with me at least.
I may be wrong but I don’t feel generally he rates as highly as say
Boetticher,Fuller or Siegel..
GUNMAN’S WALK never ceases to amaze me-it seems to improve
with each viewing if that’s possible.
I wrongly thought Kino Lorber had licensed RUBY GALLANT
for release but it is in fact RUBY GENTRY (also with Charlton Heston)
They have announced P.T’s wonderfully cheesy SANGAREE
not in VistaVision but a real treat nonetheless.
If you can get hold of them I can (again) highly endorse those
wonderful Louis King,Riobert Florey Paramount B Movies,
hopefully, someday, some brave boutique imprint will address
that situation…it’s way overdue.
LikeLike
Whoops! I’ve got my Lucy’s and Ruby’s mixed up.
LUCY GALLANT is the Pine Thomas film directed by Robert Parrish,
and RUBY GENTRY is the King Vidor film,both starring Charlton Heston.
I must admit that Iv’e seen neither film.
LikeLike
John, I’ve seen Ruby Gentry a few times. It’s… OK I suppose, very ripe and soapy but a nice looking production.
LikeLike
Ha! this thread has generated so much heat perhaps you
should consider re-naming RTHC as McGuigan’s Diner…
well it sounds better than “Colin’s Cafe” 🙂
Seriously though In thought I would put a word in for
Eagle Lion Pictures-they were not around for long but
they released several key Anthony Mann/John Alton pictures
that make them more than worthy of mention.
Classicflix have recently released several of these films-
the aforementioned RAW DEAL,T-MEN and HE WALKED BY NIGHT
partly directed by Mann.
Hopefully Classicflix will release other fine Eagle Lion films
like CANON CITY and REPEAT PERFORMANCE.
The Classicflix releases are not cheap but their transfers are
sensational and the extras are impressive,as are their booklets.
Believe it or not I have never seen RAW DEAL before and it was a revelation
to see it in such pristine restored condition.
At any rate the Mann/Alton films alone make Eagle Lion worth a comment.
LikeLike
I like when a thread, and particularly a pretty simple one like this, takes off and draws people in – the amount of info being generated is superb.
The Eagle Lion mention is certainly worthwhile as those Mann/Alton films are excellent. I’ve not seen the Classicflix releases (pricing and region coding to blame there) but I have seen some screen captures and the films look far better than any version I’ve seen up to now – well deserved of course.
LikeLike
Great subject that is producing some very interesting posts.
I think I will refer to favourite studios from my youth, and at that time l would have known nothing about film noir, which is now one of my favourite genres. RKO to me at that time meant Tim Holt westerns, and of course Walt Disney films, not film noir.
The two picture houses in my town were both second run, so we had very entertaining double bills that probably had no relationship to most of the bills on John K’s lists.
My three favourite studios at that time would have been Universal International and Warner Brothers, both for their westerns. Also Disney for Davy Crockett, Old Yeller, Robin Hood, Rob Roy etc.
LikeLike
This thread just keeps getting better……..
John mentioned a terrific double bill of “THE ROAD TO DENVER” with “THEY CAN’T HANG ME”. The latter starred Terence Morgan, an actor I increasingly seek out. He was generally very good in British noir films like this one, “TREAD SOFTLY STRANGER” and “TURN THE KEY SOFTLY” (which Blake mentioned).
I am also on a real Stanley Baker roll right now – can’t seem to get enough of the many good films he made. “HELL DRIVERS” is just one of them of course.
LikeLike
Yes,Jerry Morgan was very good and underrated
equally good as a hero or villain.
TURN THE KEY SOFTLY is superb.
STREET CORNER is also worth seeking out-
Peggy Cummins totally convincing as an 18 year old unwed mother
who falls in with crooks;Morgan and Michael Medwin.
A superb Brit crime thriller with a strong Feminist vibe and with
a good social comment subtext which does not get in the way
of the action.Nifty location work as well.
Speaking of Baker I just name dropped him over at Mike’s
WHERE’S JACK is one of my “most wanted” titles on Blu Ray.
A Baker pet project that sadly failed to find an audience.
Baker gave top billing to Tommy Steele (who is very good)
and plays a support role as the heavy (equally superb)
Wonderful “Hogarthian” production design in this class A movie.
We all have gone “round the houses” on this most entertaining
thread.
I’m on a real Anthony Mann roll at the moment (more than usual)
with the superb Classicflix releases.
What I love about the Mann Classicflix series apart from the stunning
transfers are the extras I like to see the commentators actually sitting in
cinemas (or screening rooms) discussing the films. It’s great to
finally see the engaging Julie Kirgo who I have always admired
for her involving Twilight Time liner notes.
I hope eventually we will get to see Toby on camera-after all
he’s such a handsome fellow-my fantasy is to see Toby and Blake
chewing the fat over some “lost masterpiece”
I actually watched MAN OF THE WEST twice last night-the Eureka Blu Ray.
I realized there was a commentary on the disc which I have never heard
so I sat through the film again. As Colin knows I have serious “issues” with
the film but you cannot deny the amazing craft involved. It’s quiet some
time since I’ve seen the film so I felt it’s time for another viewing.
Slowly but surely all the Mann classics are appearing on Blu Ray.
Regarding Classicflix prices,this year I have decided to go for
quality over quantity especially as some of the labels I love are on the
expensive side. I am passing over more and more “non essential” titles
to concentrate on essential titles from the likes of Classicflix and Kino Lorber.
Already this year my buying is way down from this time last year.
LikeLike
Me? On camera? It’ll take a lot of convincing (and perhaps a bottle of Maker’s Mark) to get that to happen.
Colin, this is a terrific idea for a post and it’s turned out to be great bait for movie nuts. I’ve always found the idea of each studio having a Thing fascinating. I’m in training for a deep dive into the Bowery Boys, partly because I’m in love with Monogram/Allied Artists right now. Their haphazard bounce from polish to slapdash — sometimes from one shot to the next — has a charm to it that I just adore. Plus, they have William Elliott.
LikeLike
Ah..my beloved Maker’s Mark..I remember when it hit London
some 20 years or so back…we all got hooked.
Gone are the days when I could afford such things now,
thanks to Warner Archive,Kino Lorber and Classicflix
Whoever thought that Warner Brothers would be the guardians
of my health.
LikeLike
Wrote a friend’s website and received Maker’s Mark as a thank-you.
It’s really incredible how much great stuff is making its way to video these days — and in such tip-top condition. Wait till y’all see Trigger Jr. and A Strange Adventure. Beautiful!
LikeLike
Thanks, Toby. This has generated a bigger response than I’d expected, but a really interesting, informative and fun one.
I do love these budget series of various kinds myself – highly addictive.
LikeLike
John, I know you aren’t what one could term a fan of Man of the West but I like it. To be honest, that wasn’t always the case and it took me a while to warm to it. I do think it’s both a great western and a great film now, and will get round to writing something about it at some point.
LikeLike
Oh dear…………………!
Speaking of expense,it gets worse,I’ll never die solvent let alone rich!
Still I always say..you can’t take it with you.
Just been over to BluRay.com and they have just announced
WHILE THE CITY SLEEPS and BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT
on Blu Ray. Colin,can you believe I’ve NEVER seen BEYOND A REASONABLE
DOUBT.
I was underwhelmed by the UK DVD of the former,I hated the 4×3 ratio
and the bullshit about the “directors vision”..I want to see the film
as audiences experienced it at the time-2.0 ratio the norm for
SuperScope I believe.
Warner Archive has also announced THE BLACK SCORPION
on Blu Ray and sadly for me that’s essential too as I collect key
Fifties creature features on Blu Ray.
Where will it all end.
The next item is BEYOND essential Criterion have announced
RED RIVER…two cuts no less.
I was totally underwhelmed by the Blu Ray of RED RIVER of
a few years back…will this be a 4K master ? Anyway knowing
Criterion this will be the version to have…stay tuned.
I would very much appreciate Colin (or Nick Beal’s) opinion
on BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.
LikeLike
I love those two Lang films, and have written about While the City Sleeps in the past, so that’s wonderful news from my perspective. I guess I like Beyond a Reasonable Doubt a bit less but that doesn’t mean I don’t like it. It’s very minimalist but really rather absorbing – another that will no doubt be featured here sooner or later.
LikeLike
Doing some research I did not realize Criterion have already released
RED RIVER a few years back…is this new version an upgrade or
a straight re-issue.
My comments were really directed about the Eureka version of a few years back.
The releases are coming so thick and fast it’s hard to keep up with it all.
Still I’m still pretty excited about WHILE THE CITY SLEEPS and
THE BLACK SCORPION.
LikeLike
Personally, I like “BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT” a great deal, John. The storyline is well-handled and Dana Andrews is an actor I always enjoy. His character is decidedly shaded grey in this film. Dana handles it well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I agree. Andrews was one of those actors whose performance came very much from the inside out, and there was always the sense that what we saw on the outside was only a taster.
Ambiguity is an interesting quality, it’s not something that can actually be cultivated but rather it has to already exist and can then be explored. Andrews had this characteristic – it can be seen in much of his work regardless of genre, but the nature of film noir meant it was probably employed and exploited to best effect there.
LikeLike
Always one to flog a dead horse…not in real life- before the PETA folks get
on my case..I thought I’d give those double bills another airing.
As WHILE THE CITY SLEEPS and BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT
were both 1956 I thought firstly I would feature what was released the
same week as those two and then do a mini review of ’56 in general.
The following are all UK releases.
WHILE THE CITY SLEEPS was pared with
GREAT DAY IN THE MORNING…both RKO SuperScope films
Other main circuit double bills that same week were:
TRIBUTE TO A BAD MAN/THE SCARLET COAT
COMANCHE/THE KILLER IS LOOSE
BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT was paired with
A TOUCH OF THE SUN…Frankie Howard comedy.
Other main circuit double bills that same week were
THE BURNING HILLS/PLEASE MURDER ME
THE MOUNTAIN/A STRANGE ADVENTURE
The latter soon to be released by Kino Lorber with a Toby commentary
Other interesting 1956 major circuit double bills:
THE INDIAN FIGHTER/TIMETABLE
REBEL WITHOUT A CAUSE/PORT OF HELL
The latter title a nifty Allied Artists B with Dane Clark and Wayne Morris
THE COURT JESTER/SUDDEN DANGER
The latter one of Bill Elliott’s “swan song” detective thrillers
1984/CRY VENGEANCE
SLIGHTLY SCARLET/MOHAWK
FORBIDDEN PLANET/DIG THAT URANIUM
The latter a Bowery Boys picture still getting a main circuit release
RAMSBOTTOM RIDES AGAIN/BOBBY WARE IS MISSING
The former a British comedy Western with Arthur Askey and Sid James
the support a nifty little Allied Artists B
RUN FOR THE SUN/REBEL IN TOWN
FASTEST GUN ALIVE/THESE WILDER YEARS
THE BOSS/7TH CAVALRY
SOLDIER OF FORTUNE/TEXAS BAD MAN
The latter yet another Wayne Morris Allied Artists B Western getting a major circuit release
An Allied Artists picture relegated to the independents
was their engaging WORLD WITHOUT END supported by the Bowery Boys
SPY CHASERS
1956 also saw an increasing number of “exploitation” double bills aimed at thrill
seeking teenagers another life-line for struggling independent cinemas.
THE WEREWOLF/CREATURE WITH THE ATOM BRAIN
IT CONQUERED THE WORLD/THE SHE CREATURE
GIRLS IN PRISON/HOT ROD GIRL
DAY THE WORLD ENDED/PHANTOM FROM 10.000 LEAGUES
FIRE MAIDENS FROM OUTER SPACE/SUPERMAN FLIES AGAIN
The latter title cobbled together from 50’s TV series with George Reeves.
American-International was really starting to go great guns supplying a
whole host of low brow double bills through to 1960 when Mr Corman and Mr Price
raised AIP’s game with their classic Poe series
LikeLike
Really fascinating, John! More please!
Incidentally, you mention “TEXAS BAD MAN” starring Wayne Morris. This remains the only film of that Allied Artists series starring Morris that is still unavailable to us. At one point it sounded as though Boyd Magers had some news on its release but sadly it didn’t happen. Hope it is not a ‘lost’ film.
LikeLike
John, the information you have given about UK double bills makes great reading.
Regarding the first American International bills, l can remember an actor called Wally Compo being in many of the support films we saw at our old Regal cinema. But the big problem was, we never figured out which actor was Wally Compo!
LikeLike
Jerry I think there are three Wayne Morris Allied Artists Westerns
still unreleased TEXAS BAD MAN,STAR OF TEXAS and TWO GUNS
AND A BADGE.
There is still one Wild Bill Elliott Western as yet unreleased
BITTER CREEK which I understand will be widescreen.
I may be wrong but I don’t think TEXAS BAD MAN is still
on the missing list.
There are still all sorts of Monogram/Allied Artists stuff in the pipeline
including real rarities like YOUNG DANIEL BOONE in Cinecolor.
With all due respects,I think I will give the 50’s releases a rest now
for Colin’s sake-I don’t want his blog to turn into a vintage listings
site.
Having said that it would be truly wonderful there was a blog totally
devoted to this sort of thing.
LikeLike
My point was though that “STAR OF TEXAS” & “TWO GUNS AND A BADGE” can be found at least, John, whereas my understanding as at this moment is that “TEXAS BAD MAN” cannot. If there is newer info now out there to the contrary I would be delighted.
LikeLike
Hmmm? Difficult decision, but I lean to Paramount, Warner Bros., RKO, Universal and Republic. See… that wasn’t hard🤓😇 Max of Dimitrios
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
I know, Max, pinning it down to one is tough, and also something that may well shift according to mood and so on.
Without scrolling back through all the comments at the moment, I don’t think that I have heard anyone come out in favor of MGM – Blake did acknowledge, and I feel he was right to do so too, the greater depth and range of movies produced there after Mayer’s time. But I don’t think there has been any vocal support for its earlier incarnation.
LikeLike
Well……sitting here biding my time because of unfortunate world events of the day, I came across this particular blog about movie studios and what sets them apart from one another. Everything seems to have been pretty much thoroughly discussed. So…..what came to my mind after reading all the comments a few times over?
I don’t know if this is much of an interest to you folks, but I’ll throw it out there anyway.
So here it is………………
In your opinions, which movie and/or film star had the greatest impact on a particular studio’s success or demise?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know how many people will still be reading this, Scott – depends if they have subscribed to the comments I suppose. Anyway, I’ll bite. I guess the obvious one in terms of bringing about the demise of a studio has to be Howard Hughes and RKO. Just thinking about that makes me sad.
A more divisive person might be Dore Schary at MGM. Personally, I love the vibe that came off his tenure and really appreciate the outlook he brought to the studio’s output. However, I have seen a different view expressed on that, arguing that his radical change of tack post-Mayer hurt the studio’s fortunes. Regardless of what the truth or otherwise of that may be, I remain a fan of the artistic direction he encouraged.
LikeLike
I’ll take it another direction with three entries……….
– Shirley Temple nearly single handily saved 20th Century Fox.
– Dillinger (1945) w/Lawrence Tierney propelled small-time Monogram Pictures to an unlikely box office
success.
– King Kong (1933) saved RKO from going under.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s interesting about Tierney and Monogram, I wasn’t aware of that.
To continue in the positive vein you’ve brought up here, it is said that Deanna Durbin was instrumental in keeping Universal afloat in the 1930s.
LikeLike
Back to the studios. What about all the movie producers that operated out of United Artists. Amazing to me the number of great movies and Academy Award nominations and winners that came out of there. The list is enormous.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Off the top of my head, I’d say Walter Mirisch for big money productions, and some superb pictures with Billy Wilder. The credits for Hecht-Hill-Lancaster will speak for themselves. And I’m very fond of the well crafted low budget movies that came via Edward Small.
LikeLike
EDWARD SMALL…….nothing small about this guy. He may be the only Producer/Distributor that had a part in contributing to the film industry’s many cycles of evolution and change. Decade after decade, just when you thought he was done, there it was……….the logo ‘Edward Small Productions’.
LikeLike
I concur, that credit usually signalled a movie worth watching was coming up.
LikeLiked by 1 person