There’s drama to be found in extremes, which may be of the economic, political, social or emotional variety. The latter is, of course, the most engaging and involving from the viewer’s perspective and gains from being combined with some other highly charged circumstance. In Floods of Fear (1958) we’re presented with our extreme situation in the form of an environmental catastrophe, the floods of the title. In contrast to the big budget, disaster epics that would become popular in the years ahead, this modest British noir places the focus firmly on a handful of central relationships and this limited scale and scope is one of its great strengths.
It all begins with the aftermath of severe and prolonged rainfall and storms, the adverse weather having raised water levels in the Humboldt River to dangerous levels. The opening sees preparations underway to try to shore up flood defenses and prevent, or at least attempt to hold in check, a catastrophic inundation. With resources strained to breaking point, the state has taken to using convicts to assist in the repairs and fortification. When the elements flex their muscles though and sweep aside the levee another threat, a criminal one, is unleashed along with the flood waters. As a result, Elizabeth Matthews (Anne Heywood), who has been rescued from her stranded vehicle by convicted murderer Donavan (Howard Keel), finds herself holed up in her rapidly disintegrating home with the lecherous and cunning Peebles (Cyril Cusack) and injured prison guard Sharkey (Harry H Corbett). The tension among this disparate group is palpable while the desire to get away is rising as rapidly as the rank and freezing waters outside. Although all these characters have their own reasons for wanting to leave, the most pressing and intriguing seems to be that of Donavan, who appears to have a private score to settle.
Floods of Fear is an unusual British noir, not only adopting the look and feel of the classic Hollywood variety but going a step further and setting its story in the US. That story was adapted from a Saturday Evening Post serial (later published in novel form) by John & Ward Hawkins called simply A Girl, a Man and a River. And it is a fairly simple and straightforward story, using the framework of the disaster as a background for the various human dramas taking place within. The main thrust is provided by Donavan’s quest for justice, or a reckoning, but it’s the smaller and more personal conflicts among the core cast members that account for the emotional punch the picture carries.
Aside from the fact there is a solid noir/thriller plot involving some interesting characters with credible motivation, the movie benefits enormously from the cinematography of Christopher Challis. Sure there is some stock footage cut in to allow the studio shot material to breathe a little, but that set bound work looks extraordinarily good for the most part, and it’s largely down to how well Challis photographed it. There are a number of terrific nighttime sequences with the characters struggling through treacherous tides, silhouetted against lowering and leaden skies just beyond the clawing branches of half-submerged trees and vegetation. The direction by Ealing comedy specialist Charles Crichton is strong and maintains the pace and toughness that a movie like this depends on.
Personally, I’m not entirely convinced the film needed to be set in the US, nor am I sure the consequent necessity of getting the majority of the actors to adopt (with varying degrees of success) fake accents adds much value. Anyway, that’s the way the producers decided to go. Howard Keel had made his debut as a screen actor in a British thriller The Small Voice a decade before, and I found him quietly impressive in that role. Floods of Fear saw him back in British films, once again outside his more natural home in musicals and once again turning in a solid performance. It’s a physical role and Keel provides a very powerful presence which is essential under the circumstances. Apart from battles against the tides, he gets to take part in a tough and well choreographed fight with fellow US actor John Crawford at the climax. Anne Heywood is both attractive and credible as the girl trapped by the environmental and human dangers, and demonstrates some welcome range and character development as the story unfolds. One of the standout performances comes from Irish actor Cyril Cusack – creepy, shifty, emotionally unstable and wholly untrustworthy, he steals nearly every scene he appears in. I want to add a word of praise for Harry H Corbett too, an actor whose dramatic roles have not always made a particularly positive impression on me. This is one occasion where I felt he was fine though and there was none of the broadness that I feel he allowed to creep into some of his straight parts.
Floods of Fear is a film I had first stumbled upon on TV decades ago and it always stuck in my mind. As is often the case, the movie proved a bit difficult to track down for viewing during all those years and so it was a pleasure to discover it had been released on DVD in the UK by Strawberry Media. The disc uses a fairly good print and the movie looks good overall. However, a 1958 production would surely have been shot in some kind of widescreen ratio (1.75:1 or 1.66:1 I’d have thought) and is presented 1.33:1 on the DVD. It doesn’t look cropped so I suppose we’re talking about an open-matte presentation – something which is obviously not ideal but is not terrible either. All told, I’m glad the film is available commercially and I think it’s one that should win over a few new fans.
15 thoughts on “Floods of Fear”
Probably a good companion to DESPERATE SEARCH, the movie Keel made with Joseph H Lewis. How weird to have try to pass it off as being set in the US when so many US actors were making films on this side of the pond at the time.
Desperate Search is a movie I still need to catch up with, and I’m a fan of Joseph H Lewis, so thanks for the reminder.
Yes, it is an odd reversal. We are accustomed to Hollywood movies casting US actors as British and countless other nationalities, and we think nothing of it – familiarity with the practice plays a part here, I suppose – but this feels a little more unusual. As you say, British cinema at the time wasn’t exactly short of US personnel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A highly unusual film setting, which really marks the film out. Although it was unusual by 1958 perhaps for films to be shot in the standard ratio it was not unheard-of. “YELLOWSTONE KELLY ” was apparently shot in 1.37:1 and that was in 1959. However IMdb does show “FLOODS OF FEAR” as 1.85:1.
A good, small cast of characters. Anne Heywood was, as you say, Colin, both attractive and credible, and certainly lived up to her birth name, Violet Pretty!!
Cyril Cusack was a very fine character actor and several of his acting daughters continue to carry his legacy to this day, happily.
Yes, the setting and the way it’s used is a major plus here – it stuck in my mind from my first viewing on TV many years ago. I delighted to see it widely available now and I think it has stood up to the passage of time quite well.
The aspect ratio is down as 1.85 on IMDB, although that site should never be treated as the last word on such matters. I have no idea if there is documentation available to indicate which ratio was recommended for projection – shooting would surely have been protected for Academy and a number of wide versions – but someone may be able to throw some light on that.
I’ve never even heard about this movie. Sounds like something I should track down.
About British Noir films trying to pass themselves off as American, there is the very odd No Orchids for Miss Blandish. It’s a hoot, but not a good one. Floods of Fear sounds as if it handles this angle much better.
Yes, I think it’s worth having a look around for – it’s different, but in a good way.
I did think of No Orchids for Miss Blandish when I was putting this together and probably should have mentioned it, so thanks for bringing it up here. Yes I agree, that’s a less than successful film and possibly more famous for the controversy it generated than anything else.
More…..about British Noir Films trying to pass themselves as American………….
Check out JOE MACBETH (1955) which has The Bard transferred to an American Gangster setting. (1930’s ?) Ken Hughes’ film at least had Hollywood leads Paul Douglas and Ruth Roman, and Sid James doing his American shtick. Cannot remember too much about it,to be honest except, for obvious reasons, it was pretty much a studio bound affair. Sid also pops up as a New York bartender in John Gilling’s INTERPOL (Pickup Alley) yet another film languishing in Colin’s now legendary “To Be Viewed Heap” ( I think) Paul Douglas also the following year was in Gilling’s THE GAMMA PEOPLE like JOE MACBETH sadly not available on disc. The pair would make a wonderful “oddball” double bill.
Speaking of double bills JOE MACBETH would be perfectly paired with JUBAL for an evening’s viewing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You”re right, John, Interpol (AKA Pickup Alley) is indeed deep within my “to be watched” mountain. 😀
I,m with you on your comment about a film sticking in your mind, then not being able find it for a closer look. This one should be far better known than it is. I was surprised with Keel showing he had some real acting chops. I had only thought of him as a lightweight song and dance man despite appearing in the odd western.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I still have a few titles I’ve yet to track down for a rewatch, but the number has dwindled over the years. I’m still hunting a watchable version of Nightmare, the Brian Donlevy/Diana Barrymore movie, as I recall seeing it (or part of it anyway) once on TV 30+ years ago and liking it then.
On Keel, I find it interesting that he did some of his best dramatic work in the UK.
Day of The Triffids scared the be jesus out of me as a kid. An older me was not sure what all the fuss was about! LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s not that great a movie really, is it? And yet I rather like it. There’s something of the flavor of the era that appeals to me and, like yourself, I first saw it when I was very young and it’s kind of stuck in my mind.
Floods of Fear – Offers some Excitement
The Rank Organisation appeared to be wooing and competing with American filmmakers with entries such as this. Set and Art direction (Cedric Dawe and Arthur Taksen) take centre stage for developing convincing and dramatically detailed sets, while terrific director of photography Christopher Challis (S.O.S. Titanic ’79) captures all the moody, noirish action for director Charles Crichton (The Divided Heart ’54). Crichton also adapted the screenplay and saw fit to add a touch of sensationalism to some of the more brutal elements of the story to please the action crowd. A love interest section in the midst of the action tends to slow things down, and given the situation, is perhaps not always as convicting as it might have been.
Howard Keel was always able to supply a convincing dramatic performance and the English made good use of this. British beauty, Anne Heywood is also capable in her rather tough role, and together they work hard under considerably demanding conditions. The water scenes are well-staged, adding high levels of tension while the rest of the cast supply good back up – it’s an oddity that should keep the action fans occupied for the most part.
Not sure why the DVD has been transferred in 4 x 3 when the feature was shot in 1.85.1 Widescreen – that would normally transfer as 16 x 9 full screen, but the image and sound quality are quite good otherwise.
It’s pretty entertaining overall, and Crichton and Challis present some striking compositions. A lot of presentations of British movies of this vintage seem to be derived from what I assume are older masters prepared for TV.
Hi nice reading yyour post